By Nicholas D. Kristof
Published: April 17, 2008
New York Times
The article starts out with a great sentence. Saying that the democrats won the debate, blah, blah blah, but then states that the news commentary after the debate was very biased. This made me want to read on because you don't find a lot of people speak up about the biased of the media. The author does explain the way that the people might vote after this, saying its based on psychological research, but never really states where or who researched it. Later in the article he compares the debate to some football game, and I just stopped reading after that.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment