New York Times
Feb 18th, 2008
By: N/A
This article starts and the author immeaditly states the fact and what they are trying to argue. Its very first sentence is a question which gets the readers attention and makes them think. The author presented lots of facts and good information, but didnt really have any citations or credibility to his or her name. Since they didn't even put that they wrote it. It seemed like more of an exploration argument, to maybe just present that the fact was out there. He/she does have some really interesting points about health insurance and the officials of it though. Overall, it was at least an interesting article - I just don't know how true or credible it may be.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
This article seems well written to get an argument across, but the author should have presented citations to his facts.
The article seems to be very well written. It also seems to me from your review that it was not very credible; however, I can't come to a grasp an opinion about the article because i cant tell you what it was about. I think you should have told me a little more about the article before before you gave your opinion.
Post a Comment