Opinion News: Editorials
No Date
Charles
I'm not really sure when the article was written, but I found it and it provides a terrible arguement about the war in Iraq. I decided to post it because people have mostly been posting un biased well written articles. This article is terribly written and provides no arguement at all, it doesn't even leave your options open. The author simply states facts that he thinks are right, he then provides some random number for statistic support on his fact. Who knows if the numbers are even real. For example: "On at least 532 seperate occasions, Bush and..." The whole article is like this, it's like the author sat down everytime anyone spoke about the war and made a tally of what they said and how they said it. This was a terribly written article and from the looks of the website, whoever runs it is very biased.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
This article sounds horrible. I think people often write bad articles about the issue of the war because few people know all the facts about the war; therefore, it is hard to write a good article.
I really like how you supported your opinion of the article by quoting the author. I agree that this article was very poorly written and was not at all credible. I think the author did a terribly job both in his research and his appeal. He was not at all trustworthy or believable.
Post a Comment